• CSC Home Page
  • Order Book
  • Table of Contents
  • Preface
  • Endorsements
  • Part I: Scientific Case for Creation
    • Life Sciences
    • Astronomical and Physical Sciences
    • Earth Sciences
    • References and Notes
  • Part II: Fountains of the Great Deep
    • The Hydroplate Theory: An Overview
    • The Origin of Ocean Trenches, Earthquakes, and the Ring of Fire
    • Liquefaction: The Origin of Strata and Layered Fossils
    • The Origin of the Grand Canyon
    • The Origin of Limestone
    • Frozen Mammoths
    • The Origin of Comets
    • The Origin of Asteroids, Meteoroids,and Trans-Neptunian Objects
    • The Origin of Earth's Radioactivity
  • Part III: Frequently Asked Questions
  • Technical Notes
  • Index

  • Previous Page
  • Next Page

[ The Fountains of the Great Deep > The Origin of Limestone > Final Thoughts ]

Final Thoughts

We have seen the consequences of the flood at the Earth’s surface and below. In this chapter, we saw that Earth’s vast limestone deposits are not adequately explained by evolutionary scenarios, but are best explained by the hydroplate theory.

In later chapters, we will look far above and see in many ways that the fountains of the great deep—powerful beyond description—expelled muddy water and rocks far into outer space. Some of those rocks, called meteorites, have since fallen back to Earth. Those that were in contact with the subterranean water before the flood contain traces of the substances dissolved in that water. Some even contain small quantities of water and limestone.  [See “Meteorites Return Home” on page 351.]

Up until the last few years, meteorites were mishandled in the laboratory, so these traces were lost. Sadly, meteorites were cut open using saws lubricated and cooled by water. The water redissolved these important chemical traces in the meteorites and carried them down the drain.

In 2000, a meteorite was discovered containing traces of many salts found in our oceans. As one authority stated, “The salts we found [in the Nakhla meteorite] mimic the salts in Earth’s ocean fairly closely.”18 However, there was one big difference; limestone traces were a hundred times more abundant than expected.19 Again, this is consistent with the hydroplate explanation that most limestone came from the subterranean water chamber.

Incidentally, some meteorites are said to be from Mars. Before you accept that assertion, please read “Are Some Meteorites from Mars?” on page 353. The so-called “Martian meteorites” all “show evidence of being subjected to liquid water containing carbonate, sulfate, and chloride ... .” 20 Therefore, instead of coming from Mars, they were probably part of the rock in direct contact with the subterranean water before the flood.

Communications with Dr. C. Stuart Patterson (former Academic Dean at Furman University and Professor of Chemistry, Emeritus) have been extremely helpful in developing many ideas in this chapter.

  • Previous Page
  • Next Page

Updated on Tuesday, July 23 07/23/19 21:09:53
Copyright © 1995–2013
Center for Scientific Creation
http://www.creationscience.com

(602) 955-7663