• CSC Home Page
  • Order Book
  • Table of Contents
  • Preface
  • Endorsements
  • Part I: Scientific Case for Creation
    • Life Sciences
    • Astronomical and Physical Sciences
    • Earth Sciences
    • References and Notes
  • Part II: Fountains of the Great Deep
    • The Hydroplate Theory: An Overview
    • The Origin of Ocean Trenches, Earthquakes, and the Ring of Fire
    • Liquefaction: The Origin of Strata and Layered Fossils
    • The Origin of the Grand Canyon
    • The Origin of Limestone
    • Frozen Mammoths
    • The Origin of Comets
    • The Origin of Asteroids, Meteoroids,and Trans-Neptunian Objects
    • The Origin of Earth's Radioactivity
  • Part III: Frequently Asked Questions
  • Technical Notes
  • Index

  • Previous Page
  • Next Page

[ The Fountains of the Great Deep > The Origin of Comets > Details Relating to the Exploded Planet Theory ]

Note: From here to page 326, the reader may wish to examine only discussions concerning theories of personal interest.

Details Relating to the Exploded Planet Theory

13. Formation Mechanism.  Explosions produce a wide range of fragment sizes. Rock fragments from an exploded planet would vary from the size of dust up to maybe a quarter of the planet itself. The rocks seen in comets and on asteroids are much more uniform in size. Also, comet dust is mixed uniformly within comet ice. How would a planet, before exploding, have dust mixed within its water?

14. Ice on Moon and Mercury.  It is highly unlikely that trillions of tons of ice from a distant explosion 3,200,000 years ago would still survive and be found in craters on the Moon and Mercury.

15. Jupiter’s Family.  If comets suddenly formed 3,200,000 years ago, why would the comets in Jupiter’s family now have life spans of only about 12,000 years?

16. Composition.  If comets formed as this theory claims, why would they have organic matter, including minerals that form only in hot scalding liquid water?52 Vegetation and bacteria could not originate in the cold, dim asteroid belt, so far (2.8 AU) from the Sun. This theory does not explain any of the material found and chemically analysed on the only three comets visited by spacecraft. [See the Stardust, Deep Impact, and Rosetta missions discussed on page 310.]

17. Small Comets.  Comets originating 2.8 AU or farther from the Sun 3,200,000 years ago would not concentrate small comets at Earth’s orbit today. Certainly, they would not tend to strike Earth ten times more frequently in early November than in mid-January.

18. Missing Meteorites. If comets are as old as this theory claims, many more iron meteorites should have been found deeper below the Earth’s surface.

19. Recent Meteor Streams.  See item 9 above.

20. Crater Ages.  If a planet exploded 3,200,000 years ago, many craters on Earth should have corresponding ages. Even if one accepts evolutionary dating techniques, craters do not cluster at that age, or at any age.115

21. Other/Scattering.  The total mass of all asteroids is only about 0.044% (about 1/2,300) of Earth’s mass. Combining all asteroids would hardly produce a planet.

Exploding and dispersing a typical planet requires enormous energy.116  Even if a planet composed of pure TNT suddenly exploded, it would collapse back upon itself because of the large, mutual gravitational attraction of all its pieces. Napier and Dodd have shown that no known chemical, gravitational, or plausible nuclear source of energy appears capable of exploding and scattering an entire planet in the solar system.117 A head-on collision between two planets at 2.8 AU could provide the needed energy but would not evenly disperse comet-size chunks or give them the energy distribution shown in Figure 142 on page 309.

  • Previous Page
  • Next Page

Updated on Sunday, September 01 09/01/19 20:30:16
Copyright © 1995–2013
Center for Scientific Creation
http://www.creationscience.com

(602) 955-7663