• CSC Home Page
  • Order Book
  • Table of Contents
  • Preface
  • Endorsements
  • Part I: Scientific Case for Creation
    • Life Sciences
    • Astronomical and Physical Sciences
    • Earth Sciences
    • References and Notes
  • Part II: Fountains of the Great Deep
    • The Hydroplate Theory: An Overview
    • The Origin of Ocean Trenches, Earthquakes, and the Ring of Fire
    • Liquefaction: The Origin of Strata and Layered Fossils
    • The Origin of the Grand Canyon
    • The Origin of Limestone
    • Frozen Mammoths
    • The Origin of Comets
    • The Origin of Asteroids, Meteoroids,and Trans-Neptunian Objects
    • The Origin of Earth's Radioactivity
  • Part III: Frequently Asked Questions
  • Technical Notes
  • Index

  • Previous Page
  • Next Page

[ Frequently Asked Questions > How Can I Become Involved in This Issue? > References and Notes ]

References and Notes

1. Many organizations have surveyed public attitudes on the teaching of origins. Results are remarkably consistent, regardless of whether creationist, evolutionist, or another organization conducted the survey. Typically, responses are as follows:

        5%  I would like only evolution taught.

     15%  I would like only creation taught.

     70%  I would like both creation and evolution taught.

     10%  No opinion, or teach neither.

Some incorrectly claim that almost all scientists believe in evolution. The only survey of scientists of which I am aware involved chemists. Fewer than half (48.3%) said that “it was possible that humans evolved in a continuous chain of development from simple elements in a primordial soup.” A slight majority (51.7%) said that “supernatural intervention played a role.” [Murray Saffran, “Why Scientists Shouldn’t Cast Stones,” The Scientist, 5 September 1988, p. 11.]  

Figure 254: Gallup Polls. Eleven Gallup polls have surveyed beliefs in the United States concerning origins.  People were given four choices:

  • Creation: God created man in his present form at one time within the last 10,000 years.
  • Theistic Evolution: Man has developed over millions of years from less-advanced forms of life, but God guided this process, including man’s creation.
  • Atheistic Evolution: Man has developed over millions of years from less-advanced forms of life.  No God participated in this process.
  • No Opinion

Notice how few people are atheistic evolutionists, yet this position dominates the media and most schools. Surprisingly, despite a century of monopolistic and required teaching of evolution, so many are creationists. Both common sense and scientific evidence reject evolution.

Sampling errors: ±3 %.  Data taken from George Gallup Jr., The Gallup Poll (Wilmington, Delaware: Scholarly Resources Inc.).

  • Previous Page
  • Next Page

Updated on Tuesday, July 23 07/23/19 21:34:55
Copyright © 1995–2013
Center for Scientific Creation
http://www.creationscience.com
Click Here to Send Feedback
(602) 955-7663