In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood

[ The Scientific Case for Creation > Life Sciences > The Theory of Organic Evolution Is Invalid. > The Arguments for Evolution Are Outdated and Often Illogical. > Ape-Men?]

26. Ape-Men?

For over a century, studies of skulls and teeth have produced unreliable conclusions about man’s origin.^a Also, fossil evidence allegedly supporting human evolution is fragmentary and open to other interpretations. Fossil evidence showing the evolution of chimpanzees, supposedly the closest living relative to humans, is nonexistent.^b

Stories claiming that fossils of primitive, apelike men have been found are overstated.^c

Since 1953, it has been universally acknowledged that Piltdown “man” was a hoax, yet Piltdown “man” was in textbooks for more than 40 years.^d

Before 1977, evidence for Ramapithecus was a mere handful of teeth and jaw fragments. We now know these fragments were pieced together incorrectly by Louis Leakey^e and others into a form resembling part of the human jaw.^f Ramapithecus was just an ape.^g [See Figure 13.]

The only remains of Nebraska “man” turned out to be a single tooth^h—of a pig. [See Figure 14.]

Forty years after he discovered Java “man,” Eugene Dubois conceded that it was not a man, but was similar to a large gibbon (an ape). In citing evidence to support this new conclusion, Dubois admitted that he had withheld parts of four other thigh bones of apes found in the same area.ⁱ

Many experts consider the skulls of Peking “man” to be the remains of apes that were systematically decapitated and exploited for food by true man.^j Its classification, Homo erectus, is considered by most experts to be a category that should never have been created.^k

Heidelberg man (Homo heidelbergensis), supposedly our ancestor, was based on one lower jaw. Many researchers now feel the species should be eliminated.^l

The first confirmed limb bones of Homo habilis were discovered in 1986. They showed that this animal clearly had apelike proportions^m and should never have been classified as manlike (Homo).ⁿ

The australopithecines, made famous by Louis and Mary Leakey, are quite distinct from humans. Several detailed computer studies of australopithecines have shown that their bodily proportions were not intermediate between those of man and living apes.^o Another study showed that their inner ear bones, used to maintain balance, were strikingly similar to those of chimpanzees and gorillas, but differed greatly from those of humans.^p Also, their pattern of dental development corresponds to chimpanzees, not humans.^q Claims were made—based on one partially complete australopithecine fossil, Australopithecus afarensis (a 3 1/2-foot-tall, long-armed, 60-pound adult called Lucy)—that all australopithecines walked upright in a human manner. However, studies of Lucy’s entire anatomy, not just a knee joint, now show that this is very unlikely. She likely swung from the trees^r and was similar to pygmy chimpanzees.^s In 2006, a partial Australopithecus afarensis specimen—a 3-year-old baby—with clear apelike features—was announced.^t The australopithecines are probably extinct apes.^u

For about 100 years, the world was led to believe that Neanderthal man was stooped and apelike. This false idea was based upon some Neanderthals with bone diseases, such as arthritis and rickets.^v Recent dental and x-ray studies of Neanderthals suggest that they were humans who matured at a slower rate and lived to be much older than people today.^w Neanderthal man, Heidelberg man, and Cro-Magnon man are now considered completely human. Artists’ drawings of “ape-men,” especially their fleshy portions, are often quite imaginative and are not supported by the evidence.^x

Furthermore, the techniques used to date these fossils are highly questionable. [See pages 35–41.]