Other. Today, the Colorado River, would have to flow 2,400 feet uphill if it were to flow into the basin that once held Hopi Lake.
Other. The Colorado River, with its heavy sediment load, could not have flowed into the basin that held Hopi Lake for long without filling it completely with sediments.
Final Thoughts
Probably more geology has been exposed and studied in the Grand Canyon than in any other place on Earth. Therefore, the Grand Canyon is an excellent laboratory for testing the methods and explanations geologists have taught for the last century. What is the verdict?
In words that few geologists would dispute, the Grand Canyon is a “hazy mystery, cloaked in intrigue, and filled with enigmatic puzzles.” 3 Despite a century of concentrated effort by so many, their methods have produced recognized contradictions, and they have left much evidence completely unexplained. [See, for example, item 18 on page 241.]
What’s wrong?
a. As explained on page 197, evolutionary geology has been built upon two faulty assumptions: uniformitarianism and superposition.
Figure 147: Looking South at the Bright-Angel Fault, Shown by the Dashed Yellow Line. Note the vertical offset of the two broken segments of the prominent (almost white) Coconino Sandstone Layer. Imagine the gigantic force that fractured horizontal slabs of thick rock along that dashed yellow line. The fracture extend some distance into the South Rim of the Grand Canyon (in front of the camera), and 60 miles to the north behind the camera!
Now try to imagine a 300-mile-long train loaded with the weight of the 2,800 cubic miles of dirt that was eroded to form the Grand Canyon—plus enough water (equal to the volume of two Lake Michigans and one Lake Huron)1 to sweep that dirt 400 miles to the Gulf of California and then far into the Gulf.
The train is traveling west along the path the Colorado River flows today. The depressed ground below that heavy train springs back up when the train “spills” over the western edge of the Colorado Plateau that centuries earlier was lifted more than a mile. For every pound of dirt and water that spilled over that western edge, an additional pound of upward force acted to shear the slab and produce the fault. That rebound and the vertical vibrations were greatest at the western edge of the Plateau, so the horizontal slab was fractured (sheared) along the dashed yellow line, and the west side of the fault was lifted 200 feet higher than the east side of the fault. This dramatic fault and the break and offset of the white Coconino Sandstone layer are easily seen by looking across the canyon from the North Rim.
b. The global flood has been rejected out of hand as a possibility.
c. Most geologists show little concern that they do not understand the forces, energy, and mechanisms that produced movements on and inside the Earth. Examples include continental drift, other plate movements, the production and release of magma, faulting, earthquakes, and the movements described in Endnote 22 on page 251.
It should be no surprise that the unexcelled Grand Canyon and the water that was in those two huge, high-elevation, postflood lakes are related to the most famous petrified forest and best-known mesa, butte, and spire region in the world—Monument Valley. Conversely, if mesas, buttes, and spires were formed over millions of years by meandering streams—the “textbook” explanation—then mesas, buttes, and spires should be more evenly distributed worldwide, not concentrated in this one basin on the Colorado Plateau.
Tourists gaze at and geologists attempt to describe these magnificent, massive, and startling features, as well as the Goosenecks, petrified forests, slot canyons, Zion and Bryce National Parks, other canyons in the region, huge sand dunes and hundreds of mounds and “pits.” How did they form? Also, archaeologists have wondered for a century why the people who lived in the Nankoweap Basin suddenly left. Seldom understood are how all these features are related; the stupendous forces, energy, and mechanisms involved; and the event behind it all. Part II of this book describes that event.
Historians of science have frequently noted that once a persistent enigma is resolved, seemingly unrelated mysteries are also resolved. Science then takes a giant step forward in what is called a paradigm shift, but the changed thinking doesn’t happen overnight. It takes scientists and laymen (1) willing to reexamine old explanations in light of the new perspective and to follow the evidence where it leads, (2) ready to inform others of this new explanation and its supporting evidence, and (3) able to withstand scorn and misrepresentation from those whose income and prestige are tied to the old paradigm.
The origin of the Grand Canyon has been such an enigma, but it is just one piece of a much larger puzzle. Part II of this book (beginning on page 108) describes 24 other interlocking pieces. Their snug fit gives credibility to the explanations for all pieces. Collectively, they clearly show a global flood—Earth’s defining geological event.